ONRUMA · REVIEW EVIDENCE LAB

Real review text.
Clearer signals.

When Google has no summary for a place, the next step is to examine actual reviews—not invent a summary. Try our local analysis of review text you are permitted to use.

Local preview, not a live Google integration. This page does not fetch Google reviews or verify their source. It uses simple English phrase matching, not a trained AI model. Text stays in this browser session; this tool does not upload or save your reviews.

STEP 01 · SOURCE TEXT

Add review evidence

Paste a review per line, or separate longer reviews with an empty line. You can also select a local CSV or TXT file.

Where did these reviews come from? Review texts

Import CSV or TXT CSV needs a column such as review, text, comment, or review_text. Max 1 MB / 500 reviews.

Results require actual text input. Nothing is analyzed until you select Analyze.

STEP 02 · EVIDENCE REPORT

What the supplied reviews say

Source not independently verified.

Unique reviews analyzed00 duplicates excluded

Positive wording only——

Negative wording only——

Mixed wording——

No clear signal——

What people praised

What needs attention

Evidence by topic

Each number counts unique reviews mentioning the topic. A review may have both positive and negative evidence. “Unclear” means topic words appeared without reliably classified sentiment.

Topic	Mentioned	Positive	Negative	Unclear

Method: English keyword/phrase matching only, with simple negation handling. These are descriptive counts of provided text—not statistically representative customer sentiment, not Google-generated content, and not evidence that reviews were published. Verify quoted excerpts before making business decisions.

Next step for a live business account: connect the authorized review source through a secure backend and replace this rule-based preview with validated, auditable analysis. Until then, the customer QR flow and live Google API remain separate.